3Sum
Problem (restated)
Given an integer array nums, return all unique triplets [a,b,c] such that a + b + c = 0. Triplets must be unique as sets of values (order in the triplet does not create duplicates).
Intuition
Sort, then fix one index i and run two-sum with two pointers on the right side. Skip duplicates at each pointer to keep triplets unique.
Approaches
Sort + two pointers
Tested onlyIdea. Sort nums. For each i, left=i+1, right=n-1. Move pointers by sum vs 0. Skip duplicate values for i, left, and right.
Walkthrough. [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4] → sorted [-4,-1,-1,0,1,2]. Fix -1, find (-1,0,1) and (-1,-1,2).
Trade-offs. O(n²) is expected; hashing pairs works but duplicate handling is messier.
export function threeSum(nums: number[]): number[][] {
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const res: number[][] = [];
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i - 1]) continue;
let left = i + 1, right = nums.length - 1;
while (left < right) {
const sum = nums[i]! + nums[left]! + nums[right]!;
if (sum === 0) {
res.push([nums[i]!, nums[left]!, nums[right]!]);
left++; right--;
while (left < right && nums[left] === nums[left - 1]) left++;
while (left < right && nums[right] === nums[right + 1]) right--;
} else if (sum < 0) left++;
else right--;
}
}
return res;
}
export function threeSum(nums: number[]): number[][] {
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const res: number[][] = [];
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i - 1]) continue;
let left = i + 1, right = nums.length - 1;
while (left < right) {
const sum = nums[i]! + nums[left]! + nums[right]!;
if (sum === 0) {
res.push([nums[i]!, nums[left]!, nums[right]!]);
left++; right--;
while (left < right && nums[left] === nums[left - 1]) left++;
while (left < right && nums[right] === nums[right + 1]) right--;
} else if (sum < 0) left++;
else right--;
}
}
return res;
}
Template connection
Two pointers on a sorted array after fixing one element. classic 3Sum extension of the pair-sum template.
Reflection
- Which pattern gave this away within 90 seconds?
- What changed from the standard template?
- What would break the current solution?